Skip to main content

Journalism, Activism, and the Digital Age

Digital communication technology, particularly blogs and social media, have provided a platform for average, everyday individuals to share their stories or advocate for causes. Before the advent of the internet, activists were only able to share their messages with national audiences when they received attention from the traditional media (Häussler, 2021). Now, anyone with a Twitter account can use it as a virtual megaphone to blast their thoughts and opinions on any subject. While this can be beneficial to the flow of information among citizens, it brings a variety of issues professional journalists must tackle.


One benefit to the accessibility of online journalism is the opportunity for activists and community organizers to utilize digital communications to push for societal change. The civil rights movement, women’s suffrage, and LGTBQ pride all achieved great strides for human rights thanks to organizers and activists. Today’s generation marching for climate action, gun control, and Black Lives Matter have the advantage of being able to network and organize with one another from across the country as well as engage directly with the public (Häussler, 2021). Journalists covering these stories are able to connect with key players of the movements to get their perspectives and information much faster than they could before.

 

A major drawback, however, is the opportunity for misinformation to spread at breakneck speed. Like a massive game of telephone, stories are shared user-to-user and become more distorted in each retelling. Well-meaning amateur (or even professional) journalists can spread false information when they fail to check sources or assume that the source was reliable. One mistake by a reporter on Twitter can spiral out of control making it hard to correct the error. This issue requires members of the media to be educated in the spread of misinformation, how to spot it, and how to address it. Training journalists to be on the front lines in the battle against "fake news" is a key strategy to minimize misinformation and the harm it can cause.



Reference:

Häussler, T. (2021). Civil society, the media and the Internet: changing roles and challenging authorities in digital political communication ecologies. Information, Communication & Society, 24(9), 1265-12582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1697338


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Social Media and the Challenge of Unmet Expectations

There are many benefits to social media: easy contact with friends and family, opportunities to join groups with similar interests, and a platform to advertise and grow a business, to name a few. But if left unchecked, the expectation of perfection which social media creates can leave users feeling inadequate and becoming envious of others (Wu & Srite, 2021). Part of the draw of social media platforms is the ability to curate the image one presents to the world. Carefully crafted posts highlighting only positive experiences an make the user's life look perfect, affecting the expectations of viewers. This comparison can instill a desire for their life to be perfect , too, but since no one's life is actually perfect, they fake it for social media, and the the cycle continues. As they say, comparison is the thief of joy. The prevalence of social media usage in society - 72% of American adults are on at least one social media site (Pew Research Center, 2021) - has turned the ac...

Surrendering Our Privacy

There is a plethora of privacy concerns the public has in regards to technology. Companies and government agencies can track our digital footprints, accomplishing everything from exploiting our shopping habits for profit to surveilling our contacts for national security threats. Even more concerning, criminals can use technology to hack data and steal identities, causing harm to both the individual victims as well as to the organizations that suffer the cyber attack . To combat this threat, an entire industry of cybersecurity has developed. These security companies promise to keep private data secure from bad actors, but the majority of our private data is actually used with our consent.  While most people are aware of the risks that come with using digital communications, we generally accept them as the cost of using modern technology. There is, however, a number of Americans who are ignorant of the privacy risks of internet usage, and an effort is underway to encourage "digital ...